Previous Pause Next
Home >> News Center >> Features >> Hot Papers >>
Whale Sharks Use Geometry to Avoid Sinking PDF Print E-mail
User Rating :  / 0
Thursday, 02 December 2010 07:30
They are the largest fish species in the ocean, but the majestic gliding motion of the whale shark is, scientists argue, an astonishing feat of mathematics and energy conservation. In new research published November 25 in the British Ecological Society's journal Functional Ecology marine scientists reveal how these massive sharks use geometry to enhance their natural negative buoyancy and stay afloat.

For most animals movement is crucial for survival, both for finding food and for evading predators. However, movement costs substantial amounts of energy and while this is true of land based animals it is even more complex for birds and marine animals which travel in three dimensions. Unsurprisingly this has a profound impact on their movement patterns.

"The key factor for animal movement is travel speed, which governs how much energy an animal uses, the distance it will travel and how often resources are encountered," said lead author Adrian Gleiss from Swansea University. "However, oceanic animals not only have to consider their travel speed, but also how vertical movement will affect their energy expenditure, which changes the whole perspective."

For the past four years, Adrian Gleiss and Rory Wilson, from Swansea University, worked with Brad Norman from ECOcean Inc. to lead an international team to investigate the movements of whale sharks, Rhincodon typus, at Ningaloo Reef in Western Australia. They attached animal-borne motion sensors, accelerometers, to the free-swimming whale sharks to measure their swimming activity and vertical movement, which allowed them to quantify the energetic cost of vertical movement.

The team's data revealed that whale sharks are able to glide without investing energy into movement when descending, but they had to beat their tails when they ascended. This occurs because sharks, unlike many fish, have negative buoyancy.

Also, the steeper the sharks ascended, the harder they had to beat their tail and the more energy they had to invest. The Whale Sharks displayed two broad movement modes, one consisting of shallow ascent angles, which minimize the energetic cost of moving in the horizontal while a second characteristic of steeper ascent angles, optimized the energetic cost of vertical movement.

"These results demonstrate how geometry plays a crucial role in movement strategies for animals moving in 3-dimensions," concluded Gleiss. "This use of negative buoyancy may play a large part in oceanic sharks being able to locate and travel between scarce and unpredictable food sources efficiently."

Disclaimer: Views expressed in this article do not necessarily reflect those of ScienceDaily or its staff.


The above story is reprinted (with editorial adaptations by ScienceDaily staff) from materials provided by Wiley-Blackwell, via EurekAlert!, a service of AAAS.

Journal Reference:

  1. Adrian C. Gleiss, Brad Norman, Rory P. Wilson. Moved by that sinking feeling: variable diving geometry underlies movement strategies in whale sharks. Functional Ecology, 2010; DOI: 10.1111/j.1365-2435.2010.01801.x


1. A primary determinant of movement strategies is travel speed, which modulates both power consumption and distance travelled and thus varies according to ecological circumstance. Many dense animals moving in 3D media face costs according to their movement trajectory and it should therefore equally be optimized according to circumstance.

2. We investigated the power requirements (using dynamic body acceleration as proxy for power) in relation to movement geometry of nine whale sharks (Rhincodon typus) and discovered that movement geometry significantly affects power requirements in a manner similar to travel speed.

3. Whale sharks dive repeatedly and use their negative buoyancy to glide during descents, while ascents were characterized by strong locomotory activity. Power requirements of ascents increased with the square of degrees pitch and were significantly greater than both level and descent swimming.

4. The differences in geometry of five dive types are explored using four empirical optimality models based on minimum power based on our measurements. These models suggest that some dive types minimize the horizontal cost of transport, whereas others minimize the cost of vertical transport. Whale sharks are presumed to shift diving geometry with changing currencies and ecological context. The adaptive significance of appropriate diving geometry and associated power requirements is discussed with regard to current hypotheses for diving in gill-breathers: search, orientation and travel.

5. Movement geometry significantly affects the cost of locomotion and is probably modulated by animals according to ecological circumstance. The in situ measurement of animal trajectory and locomotory activity via accelerometers now permits testing context-dependent movement geometry in free-ranging animals.


Add comment  |   Add to my library  |  Forward this article

login to leave comment